Are Banks Too Big to Fail? Measuring Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper considers three measures of the systemic importance of a financial institution within an interconnected financial system. The measures are applied to study the relation between the size of a financial institution and its systemic importance. Both the theoretical model and empirical analysis reveal that, when analyzing the systemic risk posed by one financial institution to the system, size should not be considered as a proxy of systemic importance. In other words, the “too big to fail” argument is not always valid, and measures of systemic importance should be considered. We provide the estimation methodology of systemic importance measures under the multivariate extreme value theory (EVT) framework.
منابع مشابه
The Effects of Too-Big-to-fail Banks on Depositors' Behavior
In the wake of recent financial crisis, large banks have been considered as important factors in financial markets in the world, since these bankschr(chr('39')39chr('39')) failure could affect the whole economy by extending systemic risk. With regard to this issue, when large banks face insolvency or bankruptcy, larger part of economy would be affected, and with the interconnectedness between b...
متن کاملToo Big To Fail: The Hazards of Bank Bailouts
Moral hazard is one of the most basic concepts in economics: If someone pays you for your accidents, you will expend less effort trying to avoid them. Insurance companies understand this perfectly well. That's why most insurance contracts include customer deductibles and limited coverage. This seems straightforward enough. Why is it, then, that policymakers appear to have missed this important ...
متن کاملIdentifying Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions
A key element of the G20 response to the global financial crisis has been to develop policies to address the ‘too-big-to-fail’ problem posed by systemically important financial institutions (SiFis). the first step is to identify such entities. to that end, there has been extensive work undertaken in recent years, especially at the global level in view of the cross-country impact of large intern...
متن کاملContagion: a misnomer for financial crisis
It has become commonplace to call the financial institutions at the centre of the most recent financial crisis ‘too big to fail’. This is a misnomer, as institutional size simply happens to be correlated with what really matters: interconnectedness. A big bank that operates in a vacuum is a danger only to itself and its immediate creditors. If it assumes too much risk, it will fail, and the eco...
متن کاملThe Evaluation of Systemic Risk in the Iran Banking System by Marginal Expected Shortfall (MES) Criterion
Today, Systemic Risk is being analyzed as one of the major issues in financial institutions. Banks are one of the institutions that can be linked to systemic risk based on global experience. Therefore, in the study, we evaluate the systemic risk in the banking system of the country via the marginal expected shortfall (MES) criterion. For the purpose of the present study, 17 banks listed on the ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010